HomeNADCL2010
staveley v glasshouses
| Markings (2) 1 | Outfield (4) 4 | Pitch (8) 3 | Square (6) 4 | Total 12 out of 20 |
| Match | Division 4 | Start 14:00 | Finish 19:45 |
| When Played | Saturday, July 24th, 2010 | Completed by | glasshouses |
| Result | glasshouses 6pts |
Innings of glasshousesPoints6
| Batsman's Name | How Out | Bowler | Runs |
| byron davies | LBW | k.stevenson | 10 |
| phil allcock | Bowled | j.blades | 39 |
| luke bickers | Bowled | m.carter | 14 |
| edd holmes | Not Out | | 38 |
| amy burton | Caught | k.stevenson | 0 |
| andy durance | Bowled | k.stevenson | 12 |
| euan davies (jr) | Bowled | k.stevenson | 0 |
| i.sunderland | Bowled | j.blades | 34 |
| andy wilson | Not Out | | 4 |
| graham slinger | | | |
| robbie wilson | | | |
| 1-642-643-844-855-1136-1157-172 | Extras | 26 |
| TOTAL | 177 |
Innings of staveleyPoints0
| Batsman's Name | How Out | Bowler | Runs |
| m.carter | Bowled | euan davis | 0 |
| s.smith | Bowled | amy burton | 43 |
| k.stevenson | Caught | euan davis | 1 |
| j.briscombe | Caught | byron davis | 33 |
| i.cropper | Caught | euan davis | 48 |
| s.baines | Not Out | | 14 |
| d.russell | Bowled | byron davis | 0 |
| s.hood | Caught | edd holmes | 8 |
| a.lincoln | Bowled | edd holmes | 6 |
| a.barrick | Bowled | edd holmes | 0 |
| j.blades | | | |
| 1-02-63-544-1205-1316-1447-1448-1619-161 | Extras | 8 |
| TOTAL | 161 |
staveley Bowling Analysis
| Bowler | O | M | R | W |
| s.baines | 11 | 5 | 23 | 0 |
| s.hood | 4 | 0 | 26 | 0 |
| j.blades | 8 | 0 | 38 | 2 |
| k.stevenson | 12 | 2 | 36 | 4 |
| m.carter | 7 | 2 | 24 | 1 |
| j.briscombe | 3 | 0 | 19 | 0 |
glasshouses Bowling Analysis
| Bowler | O | M | R | W |
| euan davis | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 |
| luke bickers | 10 | 2 | 35 | 0 |
| amy burton | 5 | 0 | 38 | 0 |
| byron davis | 8 | 0 | 48 | 2 |
| edd holmes | 3 | 0 | 10 | 3 |
Further Information
another win for the mighty g'houses. after losing the toss and put in on what could only be described as an interesting wicket, phil and byron set up a platform with a solid opening partnership. both of their scores were at least worth treble than they ac