HomeNADCL2012
pannal v bishop thornton
| Markings (2) 2 | Outfield (4) 2 | Pitch (8) 7 | Square (6) 5 | Total 16 out of 20 |
| Match | Division 1 | Start 14:00 | Finish 19:20 |
| When Played | Saturday, July 28th, 2012 | Completed by | bishop thornton |
| Result | pannal win by 7 wickets |
Innings of bishop thorntonPoints1
| Batsman's Name | How Out | Bowler | Runs |
|---|
| andrew cullen | Not Out | | 122 |
| rob nelson | LBW | andy ellis | 9 |
| will wray | Caught | carl wilson | 9 |
| ed paxton (u17) | Caught & Bowled | mike harrison | 8 |
| josh chandler (u19) | Caught | carl wilson | 4 |
| steve sowray (u19) | Caught | andy ellis | 12 |
| james paxton (u19) | Bowled | mike harrison | 1 |
| andrew derrick | Run Out | | 10 |
| steve brennand (u19) | Run Out | | 1 |
| matty bell | | | |
| spencer cottingham | | | |
| 1-232-1103-1304-1355-1576-1597-1818-185 | Extras | 9 |
| TOTAL | 185 |
Innings of pannalPoints5
| Batsman's Name | How Out | Bowler | Runs |
|---|
| andy ellis | Caught | will wray | 27 |
| john strover | Not Out | | 73 |
| graham fish | Bowled | will wray | 0 |
| james rawlings | Caught | will wray | 10 |
| dave wood | Not Out | | 52 |
| carl wilson | | | |
| mark o sullivan | | | |
| chris hooper | | | |
| theo britton | | | |
| mike harrison | | | |
| paul mcauley | | | |
| 1-442-503-64 | Extras | 27 |
| TOTAL | 189 |
pannal Bowling Analysis
| Bowler | O | M | R | W |
|---|
| andy ellis | 11 | 1 | 52 | 2 |
| graham fish | 10 | 4 | 23 | 0 |
| chris hooper | 12 | 0 | 40 | 0 |
| carl wilson | 8 | 0 | 44 | 2 |
| mike harrison | 4 | 0 | 17 | 2 |
bishop thornton Bowling Analysis
| Bowler | O | M | R | W |
|---|
| steve brennand (u19) | 7 | 2 | 24 | 0 |
| will wray | 12 | 3 | 51 | 3 |
| andrew cullen | 9 | 1 | 35 | 0 |
| josh chandler (u19) | 7 | 1 | 31 | 0 |
| steve sowray | 6 | 0 | 31 | 0 |
Further Information
well batted occa, sorry we didn't support you better. well played pannal. in other news this resultsheet was submitted inside the deadline, was fully completed and included full names of both teams..... probably still something wrong though.
