HomeNADCL2012
ouseburn 3rds v pannal 4ths
Markings (2) 2 | Outfield (4) 1 | Pitch (8) 7 | Square (6) 5 | Total 15 out of 20 |
Match | Division 7 | Start 13:00 | Finish 18:00 |
When Played | Saturday, September 15th, 2012 | Completed by | pannal 4 |
Result | ouseburn 3 won by 35 runs |
Innings of ouseburn 3Points5
Batsman's Name | How Out | Bowler | Runs |
n newlove | Bowled | jack revill | 54 |
j newlove | Bowled | jake pedder | 4 |
m chester | Bowled | jake pedder | 8 |
s buchanan | Bowled | jack revill | 7 |
d blacker-meek | Not Out | | 32 |
d lawson | LBW | jack revill | 9 |
s emirzeaglu | Bowled | jack revill | 0 |
c freeman | Bowled | jack revill | 2 |
a wells | Caught | jake pedder | 0 |
n wylie | Caught & Bowled | rod macaulay | 4 |
c hodgson | Caught | dan mooney | 16 |
| Extras | 36 |
TOTAL | 172 |
Innings of pannal 4Points1
Batsman's Name | How Out | Bowler | Runs |
martin revill | Bowled | c freeman | 79 |
barry waddington | Bowled | m chester | 7 |
dan mooney (u16) | Bowled | c freeman | 0 |
jake pedder (u16) | Caught | c freeman | 9 |
chris robertson (u16) | Caught | d blacker-meek | 9 |
jack revill (u16) | LBW | m chester | 8 |
paul mooney | Caught | c freeman | 8 |
rod macaulay | Bowled | c freeman | 0 |
will bennett (u13) | Bowled | m chester | 0 |
dan smith (u17) | Not Out | | 0 |
dan baines (u16) | Bowled | c freeman | 0 |
| Extras | 17 |
TOTAL | 137 |
pannal 4 Bowling Analysis
Bowler | O | M | R | W |
rod macaulay | 12 | 3 | 34 | 1 |
jake pedder (u16) | 10 | 4 | 22 | 3 |
dan smith (u17) | 3 | 0 | 27 | 0 |
jack revill (u16) | 8 | 1 | 23 | 5 |
dan baines (u16) | 6 | 0 | 22 | 0 |
chris robertson (u16) | 3 | 0 | 19 | 0 |
dan mooney (u16) | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
ouseburn 3 Bowling Analysis
Bowler | O | M | R | W |
m chester | 12 | 1 | 45 | 3 |
n newlove | 10 | 2 | 24 | 0 |
c freeman | 8 | 1 | 34 | 6 |
d blacker-meek | 5 | 0 | 16 | 1 |
s emirzeaglu | 2 | 0 | 13 | 0 |
Further Information
ouseburn 3rds defeated pannal 4ths by 35 runs in the season's final week, in an entertaining and good spirited match. for much of the pannal reply, a close finish looked likely, and with 10 overs to go, just 38 were needed with 5 wickets in hand. but yo